The MAGA New Right

'America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy' Is a Dangerous — And Wrong — Argument

Properties1
tags

4 min read

“‘America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy’ Is a Dangerous — And Wrong — Argument”

George Thomas (The Atlantic, 2 November 2020). Genre: short polemic / constitutional history. Direct rebuttal of the “republic not democracy” formula that has become a signature talking point of the Claremonter and MAGA New Right media ecosystems (Mike Lee, Hillsdale, Federalist, etc.) — the framing through which the New Right justifies durable minority rule via Senate malapportionment, the Electoral College, and Republican-appointed Supreme Court majorities.

Core Argument

Thomas argues that the “republic not democracy” rhetoric “surreptitiously fuses republic with minority rule rather than popular government.” This is a perversion, not a feature, of constitutional design.

Three pieces of evidence, each cleanly destructive of the New Right framing:

  1. Madison’s actual usage. Federalist No. 14: “In a democracy, the people meet and exercise the government in person; in a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents.” Both are “popular forms of government” deriving legitimacy from the people. Madison’s distinction is between direct and representative popular rule, not between popular rule and minority rule.
  2. Hamilton on “representative democracy.” “A representative democracy, where the right of election is well secured and regulated… will in my opinion be most likely to be happy, regular and durable.” Hamilton used “democracy” approvingly for the American system.
  3. Lincoln’s foundational pronouncement. “The rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible.” And: “A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks, and limitations, and always changing easily, with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people.”

Thomas’s structural diagnosis: post-1988, the GOP has won the popular vote only once in seven elections (2004) but won the Electoral College three times. California’s electoral votes represent ~700,000 people each; Wyoming’s, ~200,000. Shelby County v. Holder (2013) ushered in “a new era of experimentation among Republican politicians in restricting the electorate, often along racial lines.” The “republic not democracy” formula has become the constitutional alibi for this restriction.

What This Source Lets the Wiki Do

The Thomas piece is most useful as a documentary anchor for the wiki’s argument that Declarationism and West Coast Straussian constitutionalism as wielded by the New Right are not the same thing as Harry V. Jaffa’s original 1959 Crisis of the House Divided project. Jaffa read Lincoln as the philosopher-statesman of equality and majority rule; the contemporary “republic not democracy” rhetoric reads Lincoln as if he were the philosopher of constitutional checks on popular government. Lincoln’s actual words, recovered by Thomas, side with Jaffa’s original reading and against the contemporary New Right’s deployment.

The piece also documents one of the wiki’s most important structural tensions: the Counterrevolution mode rests on a constitutional theology that, on its own first principles, cannot license durable minority rule. The New Right’s response to this tension has been to dispute that majority rule is what the founders meant — Thomas shows, citing the founders’ own words, that this dispute does not survive contact with the texts.

Where It Connects in the Wiki

  • Declarationism: Thomas’s argument is internal to the Declarationist tradition properly understood — the Declaration’s “all men are created equal” cannot ground sustained minority rule; Lincoln’s reading of the Declaration explicitly rejects it. The contemporary New Right’s appropriation of Declarationist rhetoric for an anti-majoritarian project is, on Thomas’s reading, a misreading of both the founders and Lincoln.
  • The Claremonters: The “republic not democracy” formula is a Claremont-and-Hillsdale signature. The Thomas piece is the cleanest single rebuttal of its constitutional pretensions.
  • MAGA New Right: The framework Thomas attacks underlies the New Right’s tolerance of minority rule via the Senate, Electoral College, and Republican-appointed judiciary. The piece is also the analytical complement to Democracy Faces a Reactionary Counter-Mobilization (Zimmer) and The New Lost Cause (Graham): Zimmer names the reactionary character of the project; Graham names the mythology being built around its January 6 climax; Thomas names the constitutional pretext under which it operates.
  • 2020 Election / January 6 2021: The Thomas piece appeared on 2 November 2020, the day before the election whose outcome the New Right would refuse to accept. Read in retrospect, it is a precise pre-mortem.

Cross-References

Graph View

Backlinks